Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gerber v. McClendon et al
as 5:2012cv00584
Plaintiff:
Joel Gerber
Defendant:
Aubrey K McClendon, Richard K Davidson, Kathleen M Eisbrenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosengarten v. McClendon et al
as 5:2012cv00505
Plaintiff:
Howard Rosengarten
Defendant:
Aubrey K McClendon, Merrill A Miller, Jr, Don Nickles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davidson v. United States of America et al
as 8:2011cv03041
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Davidson
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and Office of Information Policy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
USA v. Richard Davidson
as 10-5902
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE DAVIDSON
USA v. Richard Davidson
as 09-6489
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE DAVIDSON
United Food and Commercial Workers Union et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Local 880 United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 880 United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Safron Capital Corporation and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Movant:
Local 103 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Michael Deutsch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
USA v. Richard Davidson
as 09-6045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE DAVIDSON
USA v. Richard Davidson
as 09-6049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE DAVIDSON
Safron Capital Corporation et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv01826
Plaintiff:
Safron Capital Corporation, Safron Capital Corporation, Safron Capital Corporation and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Aubrey K. McClendon, Marcus C. Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
