Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Aaron et al v. Hamilton County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2018cv00699
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk's Office, Hon. Mark Schweikert, Aftab Pureval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Friendly Finance Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01032
Defendant:
Friendly Finance Corporation and American Modern Home Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Rose and Monica S. Rose
Not Classified By Court:
Mark R Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Christina Rose Edmondson
as 2:2017mc00002
Respondent:
Christina Rose Edmondson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boland et al v. Bur Bros. Masonry, Inc.
as 1:2014mc00064
Plaintiff:
James Boland , Henry Kramer , Gerard Scarano and others
Defendant:
Bur Bros. Masonry, Inc.
Arnold et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00714
Plaintiff:
George Arnold , Laura Batsche , Randall Brewer and others
Defendant:
Alphatec Spine, Inc. , Alphatec Holdings, Inc. , Parcell Laboratories, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Rose Hill Company, Inc. v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 3:2011pf10014
Plaintiff:
Rose Hill Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
