Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gum Dinger Slingers, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Gum Dinger Slingers, LLC, Lee Cutting, Stephanie Cutting and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01963
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HACKER v. TRS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2015cv01025
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HACKER
Defendant:
TRS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
