Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv10729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WILLIAMS v. CFC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv10383
Plaintiff:
MICHAELA LYNN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
OMAR S. NAJOR, STEPHANIE CARRINGTON PETTWAY, CFC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harvell et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11307
Plaintiff:
Sam Scarpello, Kelli Olson, Ross Mulcahy and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duggan et al v. McPharlin
as 2:2018cv12639
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Huby, Gladys Noble, Carrol Lockett and others
Defendant:
Patrick McPharlin
Intervenor Defendant:
Cedric Grzebyk, by Guardian James Goins, by Guardian Krista Ganun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frazier v. National Aeronautics and Space Adminisitration et al
as 4:2018cv12630
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Frazier
Defendant:
National Aeronautics and Space Adminisitration, European Space Agency and Malin Space Science Systems
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00752
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Hill
as 2:2018mc51017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stephanie Hill
Brown et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2018cv10699
Plaintiff:
Brenda Brown , Keri Webber , Michael Webber and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , Michigan, State of , Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
