Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Kent v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Nathan v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04140
Plaintiff:
Miriam Nathan
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Chehebar v. Oscar Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04103
Plaintiff:
Alfred Chehebar
Defendant:
Oscar Health, Inc., Mario Schlosser, Siddhartha Sankaran and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ahmed Habib et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2022cv03360
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Gamal Habib, Joury Ahmed Habib, Sinda Ahmed Gamal Habib and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, National Benefits Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Stein v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02903
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
WHITFIELD v. LHC GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
LHC GROUP, INC., KEITH G MYERS, MONICA F AZARE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Carpenter v. Oscar Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03885
Plaintiff:
Lorin Carpenter
Defendant:
Oscar Health, Inc., Mario Schlosser, Siddhartha Sankaran and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gamble v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03742
Plaintiff:
Corinne Gamble
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Schuppert v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
David Schuppert
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Justice v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02584
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
