Cases 11 - 20 of 43
$7,058.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY; and a TAURUS 9mm HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER TAR15190 et al
as 1:2015mc00110
In Re:
$7,058.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY; and a TAURUS 9mm HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER TAR15190
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE: $9,171.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY; a RUGER 9mm HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER 32567336; and a TAURUS HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER SVI74717 et al
as 1:2015mc00109
In Re:
$9,171.00 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY; a RUGER 9mm HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER 32567336; and a TAURUS HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER SVI74717
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE: $17,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015mc00094
In Re:
$17,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $220,020.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015mc00066
Defendant:
$220,020.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Interested Party:
JAMES KIRKHAM
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE: $5,153.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015mc00037
In Re:
$5,153.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE: $97,980.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, et al
as 4:2015mc00001
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
$3,600.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, $97,980.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY and 2011 FORD TAURUS VIN: 1FAHP2EW9BG172552
IN RE: $11,320.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015mc00024
In Re:
$11,320.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IN RE: $21,014.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015mc00020
Defendant:
IN RE: $21,014.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN RE: $6,417.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
as 4:2014mc00008
In Re:
IN RE $6,417.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014mc00108
In Re:
$36,750.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY and 2014 BMW X5, XDRIVE, 35D
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
