Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Walker v. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00483
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. WALKER et al
as 2:2014cv03881
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM WALKER and SHEILA MARSHALL
Movant:
SHEILA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-5138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Earl Cunningham, Harry Jones, Albert Jones and others
Adair v. Ameridose, LLC.
as MIE/2:13-cv-12655
Plaintiff:
Anna Adair , Richard Adair , Martha Asadoorian and others
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC. , Medical Sales Management, Inc. , Medical Sales Management, SW, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. Law Office of Edwin A. Abrahamsen & Assoc., P.C. et al
as 1:2008cv00913
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Law Office of Edwin A. Abrahamsen & Assoc., P.C., Edwin A. Abrahamsen, Michael F. Ratchford and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv60760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
