Cases 21 - 30 of 125
MARTIN REYNOLDS v. STEPHEN M. DICKSON
as 1:2020cv01116
Not Classified By Court:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MARTIN REYNOLDS
Defendant:
STEPHEN M. DICKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BRUNS et al v. USAA et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
MARK A. DAVIS, ROBERT WILKIE, DALTON BRYANT, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNY BRUNS and JEREMY BRUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TALEN ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00362
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
TALEN ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC, BRANDON SHORES LLC, H.A. WAGNER LLC and others
Interested Party:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. and UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
DOHERTY v. TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2020cv00134
Defendant:
TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARTIN DOHERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCMAHON v. CRUZ et al
as 1:2019cv03774
Defendant:
Sen TED CRUZ, SEN RAND PAUL, SEN MITCH MCCONNELL and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAWKINS et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2019cv01498
Plaintiff:
DUANE MARTIN RANCHES, L.P., CASEY LEE MILLER, TROY BROOKS and others
Defendant:
BRYAN MERCIER, DARRYL LACOUNTE, TARA KATUK MAC LEAN SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MARTIN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2018mc00187
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRIAN MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and MATT LYNCH
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. REBARICK
as 1:2018mc00172
Defendant:
WILLIAM REBARICK
Plaintiff:
RAYTHEON COMPANY
Petitioner:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
STATE OF MARYLAND v. MARTIN
as 1:2018cv02486
Defendant:
RICHARD BRIAN MARTIN, JR.
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
