Cases 21 - 30 of 6,937
Derrick, et al v. Glen Mills Schools, et al
as 24-8018
Petitioner:
DERRICK, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Tina, WALTER, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Janeva and THOMAS, Through His Next Friend and Mother Michelle, On Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated
Respondent:
GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS, TERESA D. MILLER, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services in Her Individual Capacity, THEODORE DALLAS, Former Secretary of The Department of Human Services in His Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hanney, et al. v. Epic Aircraft, LLC
as 24-3306
Respondent:
BRUNO HANNEY and PAUL TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
EPIC AIRCRAFT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Taylor v. United States of America
as 24-3317
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Taylor v. Cable News Network, Inc., et al.
as 24-3330
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and FOX NEWS
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Auria Styles, Tynia Baisden, Chilette Brown and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Lorenzo Taylor, Jr.
as 24-11628
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORENZO TAYLOR, JR.
Taylor v. Craggs, et al.
as 24-3235
Plaintiff:
ISIAH TAYLOR
Defendant:
GENEVIEVE CRAGGS, TYLER SMITH, STEVEN B. WOLFSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
