Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 45,483
In re: John Picard
as 24-4062
Respondent: SHELBIE SMITH
Petitioner: In re: JOHN S. PICARD
Sk Ahmed, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-4059
Petitioner: SHIRIN AKHTAR, AFRA BEGUM, SK SALAUDDIN AHMED and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Trujillo v. Thompson, et al.
as 24-7426
Defendant: S. OCHOA, Correctional Officer, ETZEL, Release and Receiving (R&R) Officer, M. OCHOA, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff: GUILLERMO C. TRUJILLO
Durr, et al. v. City of Scottsdale, et al.
as 24-7434
Defendant: DOES, named as John and/or Jane Does I-X, individual(s) acting under the color of law, CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipal entity, CHRISTIAN BAILEY, an individual and acting under the color of law and others
Plaintiff: JUNE DURR, an individual and LOYALTY RESTAURANT & LOUNGE, LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company doing business as Loyalty Lounge
Roshan v. Lawrence, et al.
as 24-7429
Defendant: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA - OFFICE OF CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL, named as Office of Chief Trial Counsel, individuals whose capacity in unknown, GEORGE S. CARDONA, Assistant U.S. Atty and MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, in her official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel
Plaintiff: PEYMAN ROSHAN
DOE v. CHUTKAN et al
as 1:2024cv03470
Defendant: TANYA S. CHUTKAN and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc.
as 24-3182
Defendant: LEO S. ORTEGA, MARK K. BROYLES, GINA GUILLET and others
Plaintiff: SHARON L. JONES
Benjamin RichIn re: Benjamin Rich
as 24-3277
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRIAN R. MARTINOTTI
Petitioner: In re: BENJAMIN S. RICH
O'Neal v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 24-7362
Defendant: STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff: DEBRA S O'NEAL
Patrick Lenz v. IRS
as 24-5276
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Patrick Lenz, Dr., Executor of the Estate of Harry S. Stonehill

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?