Cases 21 - 30 of 83,797
Rodriguez-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3159
Petitioner:
EVELYN YANIRA RODRIGUEZ-CRUZ and JEROBOAM OSEAS NATANAHEL NAJAERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Hernandez Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3160
Petitioner:
CARMEN YESSENIA HERNANDEZ BENITEZ and DILAN JAFET RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Council for Responsible Nutrition v. James
as 24-1343
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL FOR RESPONSIBLE NUTRITION
Defendant:
LETITIA JAMES, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Cotoc-Monterosa v. Garland
as 24-3171
Petitioner:
JUAN COTOC-MONTEROSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ferrer-Jacinto v. Garland
as 24-3182
Petitioner:
EDUARDO FERRER-JACINTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pallares-Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3184
Petitioner:
GRISEL PALLARES-MEDINA, LUZ ALEJANDRA GUZMAN-PALLARES and GRETTEL GISELLE GUZMAN-PALLARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nava-Capilla v. Garland
as 24-9534
Petitioner:
ANTONIO NAVA-CAPILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
