Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Amarjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72707
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Khinda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02104
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Amarjit Singh Khinda, Hardev Khinda and Texas Buffalo Wings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Amarjit Singh Aujla v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-71443
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH AUJLA
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Brar et al
as 2:2009at01970
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant: Amarjit Singh Brar, Justin Ulrich Fatzer and Laj, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Other Statutes None
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Brar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03394
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant: Amarjit Singh Brar, Justin Ulrich Fatzer and Laj, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Amarjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-73422
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73335
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-71932
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Singh, et al v. Holder
as 08-70524
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 1:2007cv00419
Plaintiff: Amarjit Singh
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, David Still and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?