Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hossein v. Southfield, City of et al
as 5:2011cv12947
Plaintiff:
Jihad Hossein
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, 46th District Court, Lathrup Village, City of and others
Johnson v. Granholm et al
as 2:2010cv10005
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, John Cherry, Attorney General and others
Thatcher #384349 et al v. Eaton, County of et al
as 2:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Gary Alva Thatcher #384349, Mark Curtin #263758, Curtis Smith #292372 and others
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Macomb, County of, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Dwight Armstrong
as 2:2009cr20580
Defendant:
Dwight Armstrong
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Moffat v. Michigan Department of Corrections etal.,
as 2:2009cv14696
Plaintiff:
Clifton Moffat
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Adam Edelman and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Williams v. Angel et al
as 2:2009cv14556
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Williams
Defendant:
David Angel, Ron Carpenter, Kenneth McKee and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Armstrong v. USA
as 2:2009cv14110
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Frank Eugene Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Type:
Other Statutes
Fuqua v. Straub et al
as 2:2008cv12956
Plaintiff:
Alan Fuqua
Defendant:
Dennis Straub , Patricia Caruso , James Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Poole v. Michigan Reformatory Facility et al
as 2:2009cv13093
Plaintiff:
Dexter Poole
Defendant:
C Chaney, Stewart, Western and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
