Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Wilson v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al (TV1)
as 2:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Arthur R. Wilson
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, Andrea M. Dickson-Rekasi and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Page v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Delilah Page
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, David Budowick and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brinkley v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jeffery O Brinkley
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, Judith A Melasi and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Norton v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Norton
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP and Jen Kalishek
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dyer v. Asset Acceptance, LLC.
as 3:2012cv00513
Plaintiff:
Vicky J. Dyer
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taal v. Asset Acceptance, LLC.
as 3:2012cv00514
Plaintiff:
Paul Jason Taal
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
King v. Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC and Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L King
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
West v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 3:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Teddy L. West
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stamps v. Asset Acceptance LLC
as 3:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
James R Stamps
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
