Cases 21 - 30 of 39
DOMINGUEZ v. YAHOO, INC.
as 2:2013cv01887
Plaintiff:
BILL H. DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
YAHOO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
TURBERG v. SUNOCO, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03831
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR TURBERG
Defendant:
SUNOCO, INC., IRENE C. BRITT, CHRIS C. CASCIATO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LUTZ v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07672
Plaintiff:
WARREN LUTZ
Defendant:
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC. and BILL'S MOTOR TRANSPORT AUTO RECOVERY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LAWRENCE et al v. GILLETTE & PAUL LAW OFFICES, PLLC
as 2:2011cv06747
Plaintiff:
BILL LAWRENCE and MAGGIE LAWRENCE
Defendant:
GILLETTE & PAUL LAW OFFICES, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Linsday et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00441
Plaintiff:
Thomas Linsday and Margaret Linsday
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Miscellaneous_party:
Bill Nicholson, M.D.
Kozic v. Bernanke et al
as 3:2010mc00305
Plaintiff:
Gerard J Kozic
Defendant:
Ben Bernanke, Lindell H Bonney, Bud Burrell and others
CERTIFICATION OF CLI v. FAMILY SUPPORT LEGAL, et al
as 2:1997mc00048
Plaintiff:
IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF CLINICAL PROGRAMS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF LAW PURSUANT TO LR 83.2.3, STUDENT PRACTICE RULE
Petitioner:
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, BILL OF RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION CLINIC
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
