Cases 21 - 30 of 530
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-40881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin and State of Texas
Brockman v. Lumpkin
as 21-11160
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edward Brockman
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sanders v. Lumpkin
as 21-20622
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Morris Sanders
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Canales v. Lumpkin
as 21-51167
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ramiro Canales
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Narvaez v. Lumpkin
as 21-20670
Petitioner / Appellant:
Abelardo Pecina Narvaez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mullis v. Lumpkin
as 21-70008
Petitioner / Appellant:
Travis James Mullis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. State of Texas
as 21-40870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Dinah Huffman and others
Pipes v. Lumpkin
as 21-20635
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Levi Pipes
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Walker v. Lumpkin
as 21-40858
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Evan Walker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Miller v. Lumpkin
as 21-11207
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua Thomas Miller
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
