Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Infinity Technology, LLC v. Clark Creative Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01507
Defendant:
LeRoy G Burney, Clark Creative Solutions, LLC, YenRub Consulting Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Infinity Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831
Securities & Exchange Commission v. KRM Services, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01424
Defendant:
Roberto J. Clark and KRM Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00571
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chien v. LeClairRyan et al
as 3:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Andrew K Clark, William K Grogan, James R Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rubin v. Access National Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01563
Defendant:
Mary Leigh McDaniel, Janet A. Neuharth, Access National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Messer et al v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Vestal, William C. Church, David Estep and others
Defendant:
Garrison Investment Group, LP and Bristol Compressors International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Clark et al v. For the Issuance of Subpoenas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a)
as 1:2017mc00008
Petitioner:
Grant Clark and Russell Mayhew
Respondent:
For the Issuance of Subpoenas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a)
Clark et al v. For the Issuance of a Subpoena Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 (a)
as 1:2016mc00021
Petitioner:
Grant Clark and Russell Mayhew
Respondent:
For the Issuance of a Subpoena Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 (a)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
