Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
El Paso County, Texas et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00705
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Chase Home Mortgage Corporation of the Southeast, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cass County, Texas, El Paso County, Texas, Hidalgo County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00648
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CitiMortgage Inc v. First California Mortgage Company Inc
as 3:2012mc00054
Defendant:
First California Mortgage Company Inc
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc
CitiMortgage Inc v. Reunion Mortgage Inc
as 3:2012mc00055
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc
Defendant:
Reunion Mortgage Inc
CitiMortgage, Inc v. NL, Inc. et al
as 3:2012mc00052
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Defendant:
NL, Inc. and RPM Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rodriguez v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2012xc00353
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Movant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel LLP and Latreese Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2012mc00015
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Movant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel LLP and Latreese Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00841
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Armando Rivera and Nohemi Rivera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
