Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Mijeong Kang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv05824
Plaintiff: Mijeong Kang, Sunjae Lee and Woojae Lee
Defendant: United States Cititzenship and Immigration Services, Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jin Hee Lee et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2023cv01257
Plaintiff: Jin Hee Lee, Gina Shin, Jiwon Shin and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Yunwoo Chung v- United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv05603
Plaintiff: Yunwoo Chung
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Qing Guo et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03887
Plaintiff: Qing Guo, Chengkui Yu, Zhenni Yu and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE and Director of the Unitd States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hongxin Du et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03428
Plaintiff: HONGXIN DU, XIYUN NI, AINI DU and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jingyu Zeng et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03430
Plaintiff: JINGYU ZENG, HONG ZHANG and CHEN ZHANG
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Xiaohua Shi et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv03425
Plaintiff: XIAOHUA SHI, KEXIN HUANG and KEYI HUANG
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HAIDONG LIU et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv02442
Plaintiff: HAIDONG LIU, YAQI DONG, KAIYUAN LIU and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Meiting Yu et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv02199
Plaintiff: Meiting Yu, Shanping He, Chuanjie He and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-10143
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?