Cases 21 - 30 of 1,027
Dominguez-Guaraca v. Garland
as 24-93
Petitioner:
MANUEL ISSAC DOMINGUEZ-GUARACA, SCARLET VALENTINA DOMINGUEZ-VASQUEZ and TANIA CAROLINA VASQUEZ-MOROCHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez-McDonough v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-8055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOFIA DOMINGUEZ-MCDONOUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
United States of America v. Dominguez
as 23-4250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALFREDO ROJO DOMINGUEZ
Dominguez Parra v. Garland
as 21-423
Petitioner:
ISIDORO DOMINGUEZ PARRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Zepeda-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3906
Petitioner:
LUIS FELIPE ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ, ARLENA SARAHI DOMINGUEZ-FUNEZ and ENOC ZEPEDA-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez Dominguez v. Garland
as 23-3888
Petitioner:
RAMON GONZALEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Pratt, et al.
as 23-3705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIJAH DOMINGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN PRATT, Chief of Police, DEREK MILLER, Officer, DEREK BUTTS, Deputy District Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Davis Jr: Beneficiary v. Saab-Dominguez
as 23-7793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY-EARL DAVIS, JR., Sui Juris In Propia Persona (NATIONAL)
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN SAAB-DOMINGUEZ, And Family, ALEXANDER H. GILLESPIE, And Family, SIBEN & SIBEN, LLP and others
Defendant:
KAREN SAAB-DOINAS, In Her Own Individual Capacity Lawyer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
