Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pro-Com Products, Inc. v. Kings Express LA, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06035
Petitioner:
KING'S EXPRESS, INC., an Unknown Business Entity
Defendant:
DENNIS MCCORMICK, an Individual, KING'S EXPRESS, INC., a California Corporation, JOHN VINCENT TARWATER, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
PRO-COM PRODUCTS, INC and Pro-Com Products, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
John Vincent Tarwater and Kings Express LA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hudson Insurance Company v. Golden State Brokers, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00907
Defendant:
Harav, LLC, Pawar Team, Inc., Steelhead Finance and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Zurich American Insurance Company a/s/o Hoya Lens of America, Inc. v. Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05091
Defendant:
Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc., Rail Express Inc and Roly's Trucking Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company a/s/o Hoya Lens of America, Inc.
Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. RIM Logistics, Ltd.
as 2:2018cv04261
Plaintiff:
Dependable Highway Express, Inc.
Defendant:
RIM Logistics, Ltd.
Jamie Spinello v. Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04062
Defendant:
DOES, Express, Inc. and Lesilu Productions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Spinello
Urban Fab Corp. v. Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03612
Defendant:
DOES, Express, Inc. and Express, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Urban Fab Corp.
Daniel Lopez v. Catalina Channel Express, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv03232
Defendant:
Catalina Channel Express, Inc and DOES
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lopez
Nehemiah Kong v. Devon Plaza et al
as 2:2018cv03158
Defendant:
Devon Plaza, Does and Panda Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nehemiah Kong
Rico et al v. Ace Cash Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02792
Defendant:
Ace Cash Express, Inc., Does 1-10 and Marbella Re Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Renato Rico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
