Cases 21 - 30 of 19,197
Independent Market Monitor for PJM v. FERC
as 24-1164
Petitioner:
Independent Market Monitor for PJM
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-3450
Petitioner:
OHIO CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCTA v. FCC, et al
as 24-2092
Petitioner:
Missouri Internet & Television Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Ohio Telecom Association, et al v. FCC, et al
as 24-3449
Petitioner:
OHIO TELECOM ASSOCIATION and USTELECOM, The Broadband Association
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boswell v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
James Boswell
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, City of Fort Worth Texas, United States Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Florida Internet & Television Association v. FCC, et al
as 24-11701
Petitioner:
FLORIDA INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Foos et al v. TD Bank N.A. et al
as 0:2024cv60892
Plaintiff:
Seymour Foos and Vidalina R Alvarez
Defendant:
TD Bank N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KELLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
JOHN Q. KELLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
