Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jackson County, Missouri v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00571
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Turner v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
De'Qua Turner
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc., Cape Girardeau County, Jackson, City of, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0207
Ledin v. U.S. Postal Service, Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Ledin
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Jackson County, Missouri and U.S. Postal Service, Johnson County, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Jackson et al v. Senior Health Solutions, LLC
as 6:2016cv03500
Plaintiff:
David Jackson and Donald Schneider
Defendant:
Senior Health Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 252
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc00019
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC, DIRECTV, INC. and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Aames v. United States of America et al
as 4:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Aames
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Missouri, MO Jackson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
