Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Solomon v. Bank of America/FIA Services et al
as 0:2011cv00898
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Solomon
Defendant:
Bank of America/FIA Services , Wolpoff & Abramson, Mann Bracken and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv04790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv03877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
National Future Mortgage, Inc. GMAC Bank et al
as 0:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
National Future Mortgage, Inc., National Future Mortgage, Inc., National Future Mortgage, Inc. and others
Defendant:
GMAC Bank, GMAC Bank, GMAC Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tate et al v. Restaurant Technologies, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02076
Plaintiff:
Michael Tate, Michael Tate, Michael Tate and others
Defendant:
Restaurant Technologies, Inc., Restaurant Technologies, Inc., Restaurant Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
