Cases 21 - 30 of 81
USA v. Carlos Hernandez-Sanchez
as 19-20054
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO HERNANDEZ-SANCHEZ, also known as Roberto Vasquez, also known as Jose Roberto Martinez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Octavio Rufino v. United States Attorney General
as 19-10061
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO GARCIA RUFINO, a.k.a. Jose Roberto Rufino, a.k.a. Octavio Garcia Avila, a.k.a. Octavio Rufino Garcia
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Roberto De Jesus Tejada Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv09176
Defendant:
Jose Roberto Tejada Galdamez and Roberto De Jesus Tejada Martinez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3184
Jose Laurence-Lopez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72072
Petitioner:
JOSE ROBERTO LAURENCE-LOPEZ, AKA Eber Barrosa-Alero
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jose Sandoval v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71634
Petitioner:
JOSE ROBERTO SANDOVAL, AKA Mario Godoy Dorado
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jose Rosales v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71528
Petitioner:
JOSE ROBERTO ROSALES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jose Roberto Rivas, Sr. v. Daniel Paramo
as 5:2017cv00907
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Petitioner:
Jose Roberto Rivas, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez et al v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv03092
Plaintiff:
Jose Roberto Melendez, Carolina Melendez, Carolina Melendez doing business as Jason's Market and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Jose Gomez-Vazquez
as 18-50280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ROBERTO GOMEZ-VAZQUEZ, also known as Jose Roberto Vasquez-Villegas, also known as Jose Roberto Vasquez-Vilegas
USA v. Jose Facuse-Anania
as 18-50267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ROBERTO FACUSE-ANANIAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
