Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Uniformed Fire Officers Associ v. DeBlasio
as 20-2789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lieutenants Benevolent Association, Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York, Captains Endowment Association and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Department, Civilian Complaint Review Board, Frederick Davie, in his official capacity as the Chair of the Civilian Complaint Review Board and others
Intervenor:
Communities United for Police Reform
Petitioner:
New York State Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus, Syracuse Police Benevolent Association, Inc., Police Conference of New York, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rockland County Police Benevolent Association, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., LatinoJustice PRLDEF and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Cent, et al v. City of McFarland, et al
as 20-16580
Respondent:
CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Not Classified By Court:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Petitioner:
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Ctr., et al v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 20-16557
Respondent:
CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Petitioner:
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Appellant:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Yashica Robinson, et al v. Attorney General, State of Ala, et al
as 20-11401
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YASHICA ROBINSON, ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER, WEST ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, SERVICE, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp, et al
as 19-2116
Defendant / Appellant:
NAVIENT CORP and NAVIENT SOLUTIONS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Amicus Curiae:
CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING, STUDENT BORROWER PROTECTION CENTER, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU and others
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
as 1:2019cv01981
Defendant:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv01982
Defendant:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv01148
Not Yet Classified:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
as 1:2019cv01149
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2019cv00029
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
