Cases 21 - 30 of 334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith-Chester v. Kratochvil Law, P.C. et al
as 4:2023cv10664
Plaintiff:
Jamika Smith-Chester and Jamika Smith
Defendant:
Kratochvil Law, P.C., Kratochvil & Chimko PC, Chimko & Associates PC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dobronski v. Krause and Kinsman Law LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10541
Defendant:
Patricia Lynn Campbell, Joanna Bernadette Orcheln, Krause and Kinsman Law LLC Doing business as Kruase & Kinsman Law Firm Doing business as Krause and Kinsman Group, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Mark W Dobronski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv11143
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley-Rice
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Robert J. Kinggo III, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Ponte v. Quantum Law Group, PLLC
as 2:2022cv11033
Plaintiff:
Robert Ponte
Defendant:
Quantum Law Group, PLLC and Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ponte v. Shermeta Law Group, PLLC
as 2:2022cv11035
Plaintiff:
Robert Ponte
Defendant:
Shermeta Law Group, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
