Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2012cv00584
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
GERALD W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SPRATT v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00321
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC and LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Plaintiff:
PEGGY A SPRATT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHWARTZWALD v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
as 1:2010cv00473
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
Plaintiff:
DUANE SCHWARTZWALD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHWARTZWALD v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
as 1:2010cv00474
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL PLC
Plaintiff:
JULIE SCHWARTZWALD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BARNETT v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C. et al
as 1:2009cv01180
Plaintiff:
VETORIA M. BARNETT
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C. and CACH OF COLORADO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HANEY v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC et al
as 1:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HANEY, RICHARD HANEY and RICHARD HANEY
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC and CACH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ADAMES v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C. et al
as 1:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
ISIS Y. ADAMES
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C. and ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CRANE et al v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C.
as 1:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. CRANE and WILLIAM D. CRANE, III
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, P.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PICKETT et al v. LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
as 1:2007cv00565
Plaintiff:
TROY L. PICKETT, TROY L. PICKETT, TROY L. PICKETT and others
Defendant:
LLOYD & MCDANIEL, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
