Other Statutes Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
HIRSCH v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv03508
Plaintiff: NEIL HIRSCH
Defendant: PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
v. COHEN
as 8:2012mc00073
v. GROSS
as 8:2011mc00142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06541
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KANG v. PARK et al
as 2:2009cv05485
Plaintiff: UN CHU (NANCY) KANG
Defendant: JAE HYUNG PARK, HANG YONG PARK, YOUNG SOOK YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
PARK v. PARK et al
as 2:2009cv05484
Plaintiff: HYO B. PARK
Defendant: JAE HYUNG PARK, HANG YONG PARK, YOUNG SOOK YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009mc00015
Plaintiff: PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Defendant: Mc NEIL-PPC, INC
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2008cv05532
Plaintiff: PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE
Defendant: GENEVA CAMPBELL, JOHN CAMPBELL, SR., ROSE CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?