Cases 21 - 30 of 1,030
In re: Herman Ingram
as 24-11288
Petitioner:
In re: HERMAN INGRAM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Jeffery Green
as 24-11294
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFERY GREEN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
USA v. State of Texas
as 24-50149
Plaintiff:
United States of America, American Gateways, County of El Paso, Texas and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Amicus Curiae:
America's Future, Gun Owners of America, Incorporated, Gun Owners Foundation and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
In re: Carey Ross
as 24-11227
Petitioner:
In re: CAREY L. ROSS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Terrance DentIn re: Terrance Dent
as 24-11179
Petitioner:
In re: TERRANCE JUSTIN DENT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Elbert Walker
as 24-11154
Petitioner:
In re: ELBERT WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Navado Jones v. Attorney General, State of Georgia
as 24-11028
Petitioner:
NAVADO J. JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The State of Georgia et al v. Brooks-LaSure et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Community Health
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Daniel Tsai, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Darrell CrossIn re: Darrell Cross
as 24-10912
Petitioner:
In re: DARRELL D. CROSS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
