Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Rindahl v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv04089
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Garcia
as 5:2018mc00023
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Heather Garcia
Meyer v. Pfeifle et al
as 4:2018cv04048
Plaintiff:
Rene D. Meyer
Defendant:
Craig A. Pfeifle , Matthew M. Brown , Heidi Linngren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meyer v. Schroeder et al
as 4:2018cv04037
Plaintiff:
Rene D. Meyer
Defendant:
Patrick Schroeder , Eric Johnson , Minnehaha County Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. CEI Community Ventures, LLC
as 4:2017mc00047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
CEI Community Ventures, LLC
United States of America v. Smith & Wesson 10 .38 Revolver
as 5:2017mc00017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson 10 .38 Revolver
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Johnson v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2017cv04026
Plaintiff:
Leslie Johnson
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Denny Kaemingk and CBM Food Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Springfield Armory et al
as 4:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Springfield Armory, Geneseo, IL Micro Compact Pistol, Cal: .45, Serial Number LW447872 and Smith & Wesson 686 Plus Revolver, Cal .357, Serial Number CRU5382
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Hi-Point C9 9mm Pistol, Serial Number P1932880 et al
as 5:2016mc00023
Defendant:
Hi-Point C9 9mm Pistol, Serial Number P1932880 and Hi-Point C9 9mm Pistol, Serial Number P1922319
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Glock GMBH 30 Pistol Cal: 45 (SN: CDL 785 US)
as 4:2016mc00042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Glock GMBH 30 Pistol Cal: 45 (SN: CDL 785 US)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
