Cases 21 - 30 of 11,517
Mohamed v. Garland
as 24-1544
Petitioner:
ALI ABDOU MOHAMED
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera- Arellano v. Garland
as 24-9539
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL HERRERA-ARELLANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Arpi Espinoza v. Garland
as 24-1542
Petitioner:
WILSON ARPI ESPINOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Espinoza-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1525
Petitioner:
FRELIN RENE ESPINOZA-HERNANDEZ, JONATAN ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA-SOLIZ, IRIZ SUYAPA SOLIZ-RAMOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Quijada v. Garland
as 24-1523
Petitioner:
ELIDA ERICA GONZALEZ-QUIJADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mayorga-Salamanca v. Garland
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL MAYORGA-SALAMANCA, CAROL ANDREA SUAREZ-CHAPARRO and SARA SOFIA MAYORGA-SUAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al v. OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lin v. Garland
as 24-1514
Petitioner:
DONG LIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Huang v. Garland
as 24-1474
Petitioner:
MIAOHUA HUANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendoza-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-1451
Petitioner:
CONCEPCION MENDOZA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
