Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Frank Bellue v. Gary Kresge, et al
as 19-35679
Defendant:
JACK WARNER, RON KLAMERT, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF LARSEN, CIS2 and GARY KRESGE, CISA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK BELLUE
Samuel Piatnitsky v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 19-35478
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY WAKEMAN, DENNIS DAHNE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL M. PIATNITSKY
Demicko Thomas v. USDC-WAWSE
as 18-70017
:
In re: DEMICKO BILLIE THOMAS
Petitioner:
DEMICKO BILLIE THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, Warden of Airway Heights Correctional Center, and the Washington State Department of Corrections
Eddie Bush v. USDC-WAESP
as 11-70480
:
In re: EDDIE JOE BUSH
Petitioner:
EDDIE JOE BUSH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHY BIRDSELL, AND OTHER UNKNOWN RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OF THE CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES and others
Disability Rights Washington v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Washington , G.R. and D.H.
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire, Susan Dreyfus, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Harris Winns v. USDCTAC
as 09-71283
:
In re: HARRIS L. WINNS
Petitioner:
HARRIS L. WINNS
Respondent:
USDC, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mark LaRue v. Washington State Department of
as 09-70197
Petitioner:
MARK LARUE
Respondent:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mark LaRue v. Washington State Department of
as 08-75200
Petitioner:
MARK LARUE
Respondent:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
