Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Mallinger v. Chatila et al
as 4:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mallinger
Defendant:
Ahmad R. Chatila , Antonio R. Alvarez , Clayton C. Daley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sorrell et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2016mc00239
Movant:
William H Sorrell , Peter E Shumlin , Harry L Chen and others
Respondent:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dahle v. Lamb
as 4:2015mc09032
Plaintiff:
Mark Irving Dahle
Defendant:
Peter Anthony Lamb
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission v. Uber, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission
Defendant:
Uber, Inc. , Uber Technologies, Inc. , John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson et al v. St. Peters, Missouri, City of, et al.
as 4:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Gina Thompson and Karen McCabe
Defendant:
St. Peters, Missouri, City of , Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. and DOES 1-24
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peters v. Northland Group, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Milady R. Peters
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peters v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00489
Plaintiff:
Milady R. Peters
Defendant:
Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dealer Computer Services, Inc. v. Dave Sinclair Lincoln-Mercury Saint Peters, Inc.
as 4:2014mc00001
Plaintiff:
Dealer Computer Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Dave Sinclair Lincoln-Mercury Saint Peters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
