Cases 21 - 30 of 285
Burkhart v. Leasure et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NOBLE BURKHART
Defendant:
ROBERT W LEASURE, BETH A TAYLOR, GREGORY C DAVIS and others
Camargo v. Williams & Fudge Inc
as 1:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Edward Camargo, Jr
Defendant:
Williams & Fudge Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAKE v. CHAO et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAKE
Defendant:
STANLEY CHAO, FIRST LOAN, NP FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RANKIN v. NINGODWAASWI, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01519
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RANKIN
Defendant:
NINGODWAASWI, LLC, SKYTRAIL SERVICING GROUP LLC, WILLIAM C. "CHENEY PRUETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
