Cases 21 - 30 of 46
WOOD v. WOOD et al
as 2:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
TARA THOMFORDE WOOD
Defendant:
DAVID WOOD , WILBERT A. STINESPRING and THE WEST VIRGINIA CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ASHTON WOODS HOLDINGS L.L.C. et al v. USG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01712
Plaintiff:
ASHTON WOODS HOLDINGS L.L.C. , BEAZER HOMES HOLDINGS CORP. , D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and others
Defendant:
USG CORPORATION, NEW NGC, INC., LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BANGS et al v. JP INTERMODAL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2014cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN BANGS, JR. , WILLIS BROOKS , DANIEL CRAFT and others
Defendant:
JP INTERMODAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WOOD v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02247
Plaintiff:
LATESHA WOOD
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GLANZMANN v. WOOD et al
as 2:2013cv01576
Plaintiff:
PAUL G. GLANZMANN
Defendant:
DANIEL WOOD, MICHAEL F. MCGUIGAN and LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL F. MCGUIGAN, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
