Other Statutes Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 31 - 40 of 461
Hyundai Subaru of Nashville, Inc. v. Urban Science Applications, Inc.
as 2:2023mc51049
Plaintiff: Hyundai Subaru of Nashville, Inc. also known as d/b/a Downtown Hyundai and Genesis of Downtown Nashville and d
Defendant: Urban Science Applications, Inc.
Detroit, City of et al v. Lockhart
as 2:2023cv11380
Plaintiff: Detroit, City of, Sean B. Perkins and Abdul Shabazz
Defendant: Jameel Lockhart
Penthouse Clubs Global Licensing, LLC v. Momo's Bar, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11361
Plaintiff: Penthouse Clubs Global Licensing, LLC
Defendant: Momo's Bar, LLC., d/b/a PH Club Detroit and d/b/a Playhouse Detroit, Jimmy Gewarges, JJ&J, LLC., d/b/a PH Club Detroit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv11318
Plaintiff: Christopher B. Robinson
Defendant: Michael Bruce Smith, Allstate and Progressive
Genoray America, Inc. v. Complete Medical Sales, Inc. d/b/a Complete Medical Services, Inc.
as 2:2023mc51008
Plaintiff: Genoray America, Inc.
Defendant: Complete Medical Sales, Inc. d/b/a Complete Medical Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
REDDEN et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2023cv10934
Plaintiff: Tramell Redden, Princess T. Redden and Ryan O. Aghogho
Defendant: Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00397
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hanna v. Garland
as 2:2023cv10533

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?