Cases 31 - 40 of 566
Fabiola Acevedo et al v. eXp World Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fabiola Acevedo, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
eXp World Holdings, Inc., eXp Realty, LLC, Michael L Bjorkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Acevedo v. Panarese
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Donald D. Panarese, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Carrara
as 1:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Julianne Carrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D Smith, Kamitha Madkins and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Menez
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Gremlin Menez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Trent Law Firm et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Trent Law Firm and Marc P. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Acevedo v. Gonzalez
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Lucy Vazquez Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
