Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Barber v. Howard County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2013cv03739
Plaintiff:
Ellis Harley Barber
Defendant:
Howard County Circuit Court, United States Solicter General, Attorney General for Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
G. Cefalu & Bro., Inc. v. Santoni's, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03078
Plaintiff:
G. Cefalu & Bro., Inc.
Defendant:
Santoni's, Inc. , Robert N. Santoni, Sr. , Catherine T. Santoni and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Noel, Ess v. Huston
as 8:2013cv01412
Plaintiff:
Shelia Noel, Ess
Defendant:
Ann Huston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garris v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Elijah Cummings, Harry Spikes, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Valentine-Dey v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2012cv03335
Plaintiff:
Mansur Akil Jelani Valentine-Dey
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Anne Arundel County Circuit Court, Annne Arundel County Office of Chhild Support Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Steshenko v. McKay et al
as 1:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Gregory Steshenko
Defendant:
Thomas McKay, Dorothy Nunn, Anne Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
