Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Ward v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
George Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial LLC , Jeff D. Hasenmiller and Finkelstein Kern Steinberg and Cunningham, Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Copeland v. Finkelstein Kern Steinberg and Cunningham
as 3:2011cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jesse Copeland
Defendant:
Finkelstein Kern Steinberg and Cunningham, Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gronda et al v. William W. Siegel and Associates, Attorneys at Law, LLC
as 3:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Michael Gronda and Lenice Gronda
Defendant:
William W. Siegel and Associates, Attorneys at Law, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pruitt v. Lester et al
as 3:2011mc00031
Petitioner:
Rodrigues Pruitt
Respondent:
Jerry Lester and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Rutland v. United States Attorney General for State of Alabama
as 3:2011mc00003
Plaintiff:
Clarence Rutland
Defendant:
United States Attorney General for State of Alabama
Bonds v. Fortner et al
as 3:2010mc00040
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Bonds
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009mc00047
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lamont Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney General, Tracy L Stone and others
Wells v. North Star Capital Acquisition LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Scott A Wells
Defendant:
North Star Capital Acquisition LLC, Data Search NY Inc. and Finkelstein Kern Steinberg & Cunningham, Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009mc00146
Petitioner:
Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Ellis v. Burr et al
as 3:2009mc00122
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Ellis
Defendant:
Jacqueline A. Burr, Wendy J. Davis, Michelle Waynick and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
