Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 277
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5061
Plaintiff / Appellee: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellant: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Cindy Alegre, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 22-55070
Plaintiff / Appellant: CINDY ALEGRE, FRANK ALEGRE, MICHAEL ALEGRE and others
Defendant / Appellee: SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, United States of America, in her official capacity, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior - Indian Affairs, United States of America, in his official capacity, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior - United States of America, in his official capacity and others
Samuel Kent v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 22-70013
Petitioner: SAMUEL JAMES KENT
Respondent: DARRYL LACOUNTE, Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv03018
Plaintiff: Lower Brule Sioux Tribe
Defendant: Hon. Deb Haaland, United States Department of Interior, Bryan Newland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Block et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01025
Plaintiff: Bruce Block and Janice Block
Defendant: United States of America, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Backcountry Against Dumps, et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 21-55869
Plaintiff / Appellant: BACKCOUNTRY AGAINST DUMPS, DONNA TISDALE and JOE E. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DARRYL LACOUNTE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, AMY DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the Pacific Region of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: TERRA-GEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC and CAMPO BAND OF DIEGUENO MISSION INDIANS
Choc Harper, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-71241
Not Classified By Court: In re: CHOC HARPER, HARLEY REYNOLDS and SAMUEL L. BIERS
Petitioner: CHOC HARPER
Respondent: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BRYAN BOWKER, in his official capacity as the Western Regional Director Bureau of Indian Affairs, THE COURT OF INDIAN OFFENSES FOR THE WESTERN REGION-ELKO and others
Paul Grondal, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35507
Defendant: ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
KANAM et al v. HAALAND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01690
Plaintiff: Pilchuck Nation and KURT KANAM
Defendant: DEB HAALAND, BRYAN NEWLAND, DARRYL LACOUNTE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?