Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2012cv00663
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jane Doe , John Doe , Cynthia D. Kinser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00057
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Day v. United States District Court
as 1:2011cv00957
Plaintiff:
George Cornelius Day
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00024
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Scott v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2010mc00020
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Regina V.K. Williams, Bernard A. Pishko and others
Scott v. Norfolk Circuit Court et al
as 2:2010mc00011
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
Norfolk Circuit Court, Everett A. Martin, Jr., City of Norfolk and others
Naill v. U. S. Bank, National Association
as 3:2010cv00025
Interested Party:
Circuit Court of Louisa County
Plaintiff:
Virginia L. Naill
Defendant:
U. S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00024
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Roy v. McCain, et al.
as 1:2008mc00029
Plaintiff:
Kamal Roy
Defendant:
John McCain, Barack H. Obama, Hillary R. Clinton and others
Harper et al v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 1:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Vera C. Harper and David A. Harper
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association, Steve Lee, J. Louis Blanco and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
