Cases 31 - 40 of 41
San Diego Baykeeper, et al v. US Dept of Defense, et al
as 3:2002cv00499
Plaintiff:
San Diego Baykeeper , Surfrider Foundation , American Canoe Association and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense , Donald H Rumsfeld , US Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365
FREEDOM NY V DEFENSE
as 02-1130
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
DEFENSE V FREEDOM NY
as 02-1105
Appellant:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Appellee:
FREEDOM NY, INC., FREEDOM NY, INC., FREEDOM NY, INC. and others
Bldg Const Trd Dept, et al v. Allbaugh, Joe, et al
as 01-5436
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO, Contra Costa Building and Construction Trades Council and City of Richmond, California
Defendant - Appellant:
Joe Allbaugh, Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Melquiades Martinez, Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
NY St Thruway Authority, State of Maryland, Sierra Club and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
National Right to Work Legal Defense & Education Foundation, Inc., Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., Associated Builders and Contractors of Metropolitan Washington, Inc. and others
Amer Fed Govt Empl, et al v. Rumsfeld, Donald H., et al
as 01-5417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 1858, James Brothers, President, AFGE, Local 1858 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald H. Rumsfeld, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, John G. Coburn, General in his official capacity as Commander, Army Material Command, Julian A. Sullivan, Jr., Major General in his official capacity as Commander, U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal and others
DEFENSE V UNITED TECHNOLOGIES
as 02-1071
Amicus Curiae:
AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT BUSINESS OF FINANCIAL EXECUTIVES INTERNATIONAL, MANUFACTURERS ALLIANCE/MAPI Inc. and others
Appellant:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Appellee:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY and others
EASTMAN KODAK V DEFENSE
as 02-1058
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Appellant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and others
KEARFOTT GUIDANCE V DEFENSE
as 02-1039
Amicus Curiae:
BAE SYSTEMS Information & Electronic Systems Integration,Inc, DynCorp Information Systems, LLC, BAE SYSTEMS Information & Electronic Systems Integration,Inc and others
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense and others
Appellant:
KEARFOTT GUIDANCE & NAVIGATION CORPORATION, KEARFOTT GUIDANCE & NAVIGATION CORPORATION, KEARFOTT GUIDANCE & NAVIGATION CORPORATION and others
DEFENSE V APPLIED COMPANIES
as 01-1630
Appellee:
APPLIED COMPANIES, INC.
Appellant:
Donald H. Rumsfeld, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
NESS MANUFACTURING V DEFENSE
as 01-1351
Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Appellant:
NESS MANUFACTURING, INC., NESS MANUFACTURING, INC. and NESS MANUFACTURING, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
