Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Lisa Corson v. Dharma Communications et al
as 2:2018cv03780
Plaintiff:
Lisa Corson
Defendant:
Dharma Communications, Does and Douglas Ellis
Robert Lee Ellis v. Josie Gascelo
as 2:2018cv03519
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Josie Gascelo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Willie Marshall Fant v. B. Ellis et al
as 5:2018cv00678
Defendant:
Correctional Officer B. Ellis and Correctional Officer B. Ellis
Plaintiff:
Willie Marshall Fant
Walter Ellis v. Swift Transportation Compay, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00401
Defendant:
Central Refrigerated Services, LLC, Does and Swift Transportation Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walter L Ellis
Balubhai Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018mc00020
Plaintiff:
Harun Aala, Sofia Aguilar, Derrick Avery and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Balubhai Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv01219
Plaintiff:
Harun Aala, Sofia Aguilar, Derrick Avery and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv07092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
