Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Cahill et al v. Citrus World, Inc.
as 2:2012cv03752
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cahill and Frank Rogers
Defendant:
Citrus World, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Camp v. Alabama Telco Credit Union et al
as 2:2012cv02237
Plaintiff:
Rachel Camp
Defendant:
Alabama Telco Credit Union , Dan Austin , Lowell Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Boss 25, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01724
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Boss 25, Inc. and Frank Haywood
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Woody et al v. Gray
as 2:2012mc01125
Plaintiff:
Ronald Woody, L, Frank L Gray, III, John H Ross and others
Defendant:
John H Gray, II
Crawford et al v, BP America Production Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
Clyde Crawford , Shirley Crawford , Gary R. Huey and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company, Inc. , Edmund Thompson , Joseph Lobo and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Siragusa
as 2:2010cv01973
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Frank Siragusa
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Bowhall v. Obama et al
as 2:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
William E. Bowhall
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, William J. Clinton, Jimmy Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheeler v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv00565
Plaintiff:
Maida Wheeler
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Abrahams et al v. Phill-Con Services, LLC
as 2:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ethel L. Abrahams , Frank Acoff , Ozel Benjamin and others
Defendant:
Phill-Con Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
