Cases 31 - 40 of 43
FRANK v. BAYH et al
as 1:2010cv01028
Defendant:
SUSAN BAYH, EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, GARY KASEFF and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NEAL FRANK
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent:
TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VENNES
as 1:2008mc00198
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FRANK E. VENNES, JR.
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc, PCI and others
Receiver:
Douglas A Kelley
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETTERS et al
as 1:2008mc00194
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, PETTERS COMPANY INC., PCI and others
Receiver:
DOUGLAS A. KELLEY
IN RE: CLE REQUIREMENTS
as 1:2008mc00093
Respondent:
BRENDAN EDWARD WALKER, ROBERT GREGORY FORBES, LEWIS GLENN BENHAM and others
GREGG v. INDIANA CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES et al
as 4:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
LINDA S. GREGG
Defendant:
INDIANA CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES - DEARBORN COUNTY, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES OHIO COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
MCCARTHY et al v. FULLER et al
as 1:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
KEVIN B. MCCARTHY, KEVIN B. MCCARTHY, KEVIN B. MCCARTHY and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA ANN FULLER, AUDREY FRANK, LISA JOHNSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
