Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Houston v. Hilton et al (TV2)
as 3:2012mc00008
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Stacia Hilton, James Thomas Fowler, Ronald Gibbs and others
Henry v. Alexander et al
as 1:2012cv00008
Defendant:
Hope Alexander , Patricia Bazemore , Heidi Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Houston v. Stockton et al
as 3:2011mc00026
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Jack Stockton, Tim Phillips, Vicki Owen and others
Houston v. Stockton et al (TV1)
as 3:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Jack Stockton, Lyndsay F Sanders, Terry Stooksbury and others
Franks v. Gault Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00420
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Franks
Defendant:
Gault Financial, LLC , Michael S Harb and Thompson and Booth, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Franks v. Gault Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Nancy G Franks
Defendant:
Gault Financial, LLC , Michael S Harb and Thompson and Booth, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Castro v. Northern Asset Management, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Joy Castro
Defendant:
Northern Asset Management, LLC and Frank Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Terry v. Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02803
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Terry
Defendant:
Delanor, Kemper & Associates, LLC, Frank D. Watson and Wilton K. Caver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Srivastava v. Herz et al
as 3:2010cv00853
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
Marian Herz, Retirement Living, Inc., Donahoe Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Davies et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02520
Plaintiff:
Sandmann Davies, Sandmann Davies, Sandmann Davies and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc., RMK Advantage Income Fund, Inc., RMK High Income Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
