Cases 31 - 40 of 48
WHITMAN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01075
Plaintiff:
ETHEL WHITMAN and GLENN WHITMAN
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and others
KLEID v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01064
Plaintiff:
ADELE E. KLEID
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and others
GARMAN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01020
Plaintiff:
ROSE ANN GARMAN and DENNIS E. GARMAN
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and others
HOLTON et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01037
Plaintiff:
KAREN LYNN AYSCUE HOLTON and JOHN W. HOLTON
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and others
Christensen v. Papadopoulos et al
as 3:2011cv02636
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Christensen
Defendant:
Stelios Papadopoulos, Mark G. Foletta, Marios Fotiadis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Mylan Inc. et al
as 3:2010mc80237
Plaintiff:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
Defendant:
Mylan Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Petitioner:
Genentech Inc
IN RE APOTEX
as 10-M941
Petitioner:
Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., Apotex Corp. and others
Respondent:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and others
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
IN RE HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC
as 09-M911
Petitioner:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Roche Colorado Corp., Roche Laboratories Inc. and others
Respondent:
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc.
AMGEN V F HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE
as 09-1020
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Amgen, Inc.
Defendant-Appellant:
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and Roche Diagnostics GmbH
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
