Cases 31 - 40 of 571
Bryant v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pulzone et al v. Kaleyra, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
JULIA PULZONE, IPAI TERRY HSIAO, JOHN CANTER and others
Defendant:
KALEYRA, INC. and DARIO CALOGERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Harrison v. Kendall, III
as 1:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
John R. Harrison
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Meehan v. Capital One, N.A.
as 1:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
John Meehan
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fees Transfer Act
POLIDI v. MENDEL et al
as 1:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Spanos v. Gibney
as 3:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Nickolas G. Spanos
Defendant:
John A. Gibney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rivers v. Wynne et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Bank of the James Financial Group Inc., John Wynne, James Wynne and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal VL Rivers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bryant v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Spinnaker Resorts, Inc., King's Creek Plantation, L.L.C. and King's Creek Resorts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
