Cases 31 - 40 of 48
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Guerra et al
as 5:2011cv00092
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Benito Guerra and Maria Julieta Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
Humberto Garcia-Molina, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-13397
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO PRIN GARCIA-MOLINA and JULIETA ANTONIA MILAGROS SANTANDER PALERMO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Cortez-Lopez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-71828
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE CORTEZ-LOPEZ and JULIETA CONSUELO PALACIOS-MAURICIO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
National Organization of Assistance For Homeowners v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2011cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ganir Aguilar, Marco Aguirre, Epsom Almazan and others
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Casas and Hipotecas, Does and others
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Guerra et al
as 4:2010cv01459
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Benito Guerra and Maria Julieta Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
Julieta Rodriguez Smith v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71154
Petitioner:
JULIETA RODRIGUEZ SMITH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Juan Cortez Lopez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-70468
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE CORTEZ LOPEZ and JULIETA CONSUELO PALACIOS MAURICIO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Virginia Garcia Barrera, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-10477
Petitioner:
VIRGINIA JULIETA GARCIA BARRERA, JOSE ANTONIO GARCIA ARRIOLA, SANTIOS BARRERA and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Julieta Alvarez v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv05768
Plaintiff:
Julieta Alvarez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Julieta Escobar Suarez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-71298
Petitioner:
JULIETA ESCOBAR SUAREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
